<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>DIXON.AI</title><description>Reliability tests of which AI you can trust: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity and Grok, graded against the primary source on real money and everyday questions.</description><link>https://dixon.ai/</link><item><title>5 questions to ask AI before buying any stock (2026)</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/5-questions-to-ask-ai-before-buying-any-stock/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/5-questions-to-ask-ai-before-buying-any-stock/</guid><description>Five questions to ask AI before buying any stock, for the hour before you commit capital, when the research is done and the decision is about to be made.</description><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>7 AI prompts for covered calls (2026)</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/7-ai-prompts-for-covered-calls/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/7-ai-prompts-for-covered-calls/</guid><description>Ask AI to pick a covered-call strike and it invents one. Seven prompts that work instead, because they start from real numbers off your own broker screen.</description><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>AI cites the wrong source: I put 6 UK questions to 5 assistants and opened every link</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-cites-wrong-source/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-cites-wrong-source/</guid><description>I asked five AI assistants six everyday UK questions, made each one cite a source, then opened every link. Three cited a real page that didn&apos;t back the claim.</description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>AI covered calls: when NOT to sell another one</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-covered-calls-when-not-to-sell/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-covered-calls-when-not-to-sell/</guid><description>The AI doesn&apos;t pick the trade, it stops you making a bad one. Five rules that say wait, the prompt that runs the check, and six real trades behind it.</description><pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>AI earnings call red flags: three phrases to watch for in the transcript</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-earnings-call-red-flags/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-earnings-call-red-flags/</guid><description>AI earnings call red flags: three patterns that recur across calls. Upward hedges, widening guidance, absent topics. Claude caught all three on META Q1 2026.</description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>AI ISA advice: I tested four tools on the questions people get wrong</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-isa-accuracy-test/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-isa-accuracy-test/</guid><description>I asked four AI tools for ISA advice on the questions people get wrong. All four aced the basics, then two gave a rule abolished in April 2024.</description><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>I opened a private AI chat. It still knew my name and my rough location.</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-knew-things-i-never-told-it/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-knew-things-i-never-told-it/</guid><description>I asked three AI tools a generic question in their private modes. Perplexity greeted me by my first name and placed me near a city 30 miles away. Here&apos;s what private really means.</description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>AI&apos;s limits in options trading: 6 numbers it invents</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-limitations-options-trading/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-limitations-options-trading/</guid><description>The limitations of AI in options trading: it can&apos;t see live prices, so it invents them. Four jobs it helps with, six where it makes the numbers up.</description><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The one AI prompt I run the morning before earnings</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-pre-trade-prompt-earnings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-pre-trade-prompt-earnings/</guid><description>Most AI earnings prompts are reactive. This AI earnings pre-trade prompt runs the morning before: commit your sell, add, and hold triggers before the call.</description><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The AI prompt I run before every sell decision</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-prompt-before-sell-decision/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-prompt-before-sell-decision/</guid><description>Every other sell-decision prompt asks AI whether to sell. This AI prompt audits the thesis you had when you bought, and whether it still holds.</description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>AI earnings call analysis: the 5 prompts I actually run</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-prompts-for-earnings-call-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-prompts-for-earnings-call-analysis/</guid><description>Five prompts for AI earnings call analysis that read the language the numbers miss: omissions, performative confidence, and quarter-on-quarter drift.</description><pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>AI quality of earnings review: 4 prompts to find the real profit</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-quality-of-earnings-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-quality-of-earnings-review/</guid><description>Headline profit isn&apos;t always what a company earned. Four AI prompts get to the real number, an AI quality of earnings review for any earnings report.</description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>AI stock picker: I asked three models if I should buy NVDA, and watched the methodology break</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-stock-picker/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-stock-picker/</guid><description>I asked three AI models whether to buy NVDA. Same confident tone from all three, and only one volunteered which of its own numbers not to trust yet.</description><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>AI stock research tools tested: what each one got wrong</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-stock-research-tools-tested/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/ai-stock-research-tools-tested/</guid><description>AI stock research tools tested on real trades: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity, with the specific failure of each, named, dated, and screenshotted.</description><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Best AI for Earnings Reports? ChatGPT vs Claude vs Perplexity</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/best-ai-tools-for-earnings-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/best-ai-tools-for-earnings-analysis/</guid><description>I ran ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity through four earnings-report tests on Meta. No single winner: Perplexity for the numbers, Claude for the read.</description><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Best free AI for stock market analysis: 7 tested (2026)</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/best-free-ai-tools-for-stock-research/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/best-free-ai-tools-for-stock-research/</guid><description>Seven free AI tools for stock market analysis, each tested at its real free tier. No trials counted as free. One per stage, with the honest limit on each.</description><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Does ChatGPT make up sources? I checked two finance claims against the actual pages</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/can-you-trust-chatgpt-sources/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/can-you-trust-chatgpt-sources/</guid><description>Does ChatGPT make up sources? Mostly no, but I opened every link on two finance questions and found a real gov.uk page that didn&apos;t back the claim.</description><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>ChatGPT vs Claude for earnings call analysis: which one reads what management didn&apos;t say</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/chatgpt-vs-claude-earnings-call-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/chatgpt-vs-claude-earnings-call-analysis/</guid><description>ChatGPT vs Claude for earnings call analysis: same passage, same day. One caught the word that moved the stock; one summarised the figures.</description><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Claude vs ChatGPT vs Gemini for stock analysis, tested</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/chatgpt-vs-claude-vs-perplexity-stock-research/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/chatgpt-vs-claude-vs-perplexity-stock-research/</guid><description>I put the same stock-analysis prompts to Claude, ChatGPT and Gemini. Claude won four of five; Gemini invented an options chain. Which to trust, per task.</description><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Claude prompts for investing: 6 real examples</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/claude-prompts-for-investing-real-outputs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/claude-prompts-for-investing-real-outputs/</guid><description>Six Claude prompts for investing, with the actual outputs each one returned on MSFT, META and NVDA, and what had to be checked before using them.</description><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>What every AI stock research comparison gets wrong</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/comparison-articles-get-wrong/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/comparison-articles-get-wrong/</guid><description>Most AI stock research comparison pieces test retrieval and issue verdicts about reasoning. Five failure modes, and what a comparison should measure instead.</description><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Does AI change its answer when you push back? I told five AIs they were wrong</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/does-ai-cave-when-you-push-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/does-ai-cave-when-you-push-back/</guid><description>I gave five AI tools a correct answer, then pushed back with a wrong one. On one fund fee, ChatGPT caved every time and invented a fact to back my wrong number.</description><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Gemini audited my website, and reviewed a different business entirely</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/gemini-audited-the-wrong-business/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/gemini-audited-the-wrong-business/</guid><description>A Gemini hallucination example: asked to audit dixon.ai, Gemini Flash reviewed a different company entirely, and praised a framework that isn&apos;t mine.</description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>How often is ChatGPT wrong? I kept a running tally across 20 real AI tests</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/how-often-is-chatgpt-wrong/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/how-often-is-chatgpt-wrong/</guid><description>How often is ChatGPT wrong? Across 20 real tests on questions I had to answer, here&apos;s the pattern: what it gets right, what it invents, and why.</description><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>How to tell if an AI answer is true in 30 seconds</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/how-to-tell-if-an-ai-answer-is-true-in-30-seconds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/how-to-tell-if-an-ai-answer-is-true-in-30-seconds/</guid><description>Two questions, and a prompt you can copy, that catch a confident, wrong AI answer before you act on it. No jargon, no AI knowledge needed.</description><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>I asked 4 AIs to scale a recipe. Two got the maths wrong.</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/i-asked-4-ais-to-scale-a-recipe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/i-asked-4-ais-to-scale-a-recipe/</guid><description>Does ChatGPT get maths wrong? I scaled a pancake recipe across four AI tools. Two said 45 minutes. They were wrong, and a four-line prompt fixed it.</description><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>I let three rival AIs audit my own AI method. They agreed on the weak step.</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/i-let-rival-ais-audit-my-method/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/i-let-rival-ais-audit-my-method/</guid><description>I asked three frontier models from three different labs to tear apart the method I use to keep AI honest. All three flagged the same step, and they were right.</description><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Is ChatGPT accurate? I asked four AIs one simple money question and checked every number</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/is-chatgpt-accurate/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/is-chatgpt-accurate/</guid><description>Is ChatGPT accurate? I asked four AIs one common money question and checked every number against the source. Here&apos;s what each got right and made up.</description><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Is Grok good for stock research? I ran the same test on the fifth tool</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/is-grok-good-for-stock-research/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/is-grok-good-for-stock-research/</guid><description>Is Grok good for stock research? I ran four dimensions of my AI comparison on its free tier: strong reasoning, one unit slip, a constraint it would not keep.</description><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Is Perplexity good for investment research? An honest, scored audit</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/is-perplexity-good-for-investment-research/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/is-perplexity-good-for-investment-research/</guid><description>Is Perplexity good for investment research? Every review I found was a glowing feature tour. I tested it on real names and scored where it works and breaks.</description><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Make it show its working</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/make-it-show-its-working/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/make-it-show-its-working/</guid><description>An AI hallucination is a model blending what it knows with what it invents, in one tone. One prompt sorts the two into separate lists, so you see the guesses.</description><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>I run an AI to catch AI mistakes. It fell for a fake.</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/my-ai-radar-believed-a-fake/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/my-ai-radar-believed-a-fake/</guid><description>The automated radar that watches this site for AI-reliability failures logged a satirical incident report as a real, documented one. Here&apos;s what caught it.</description><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>9 types of AI hallucinations, named from real tests</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/nine-ways-ai-gets-it-wrong/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/nine-ways-ai-gets-it-wrong/</guid><description>Nine types of AI hallucinations, named and defined, each tied to a dated, logged failure from my own sessions, with the check that catches it.</description><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Real AI hallucination examples, caught and dated</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/real-ai-hallucination-examples/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/real-ai-hallucination-examples/</guid><description>Six real AI hallucination examples I ran into myself, each one checkable against a real source, with the one move that would have caught it.</description><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Robinhood Cortex Digests review: tested in May, gone by June</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/robinhood-cortex-digests-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/robinhood-cortex-digests-review/</guid><description>I tested Robinhood Cortex Digests on a UK ISA in May 2026, checking its numbers line by line against Meta&apos;s results. By June it had vanished from UK accounts.</description><pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The single prompt change that made AI analysis worth using</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/the-single-prompt-change-that-made-ai-analysis-useful/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/the-single-prompt-change-that-made-ai-analysis-useful/</guid><description>One AI prompt separates observable facts from assumptions in any stock analysis. What that changes, why it matters for investing, and how to apply it.</description><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The whole method, in four questions</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/the-whole-method-in-four-questions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/the-whole-method-in-four-questions/</guid><description>The four questions I run any AI answer through before I trust it, shown end to end on one everyday example, with a prompt you can copy. No jargon.</description><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Does web search make AI more accurate? I ran the same questions both ways</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/web-search-makes-ai-differently-unreliable/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/web-search-makes-ai-differently-unreliable/</guid><description>Does web search make AI more accurate? I ran the same questions both ways. It didn&apos;t make the answers more reliable. It moved where the errors hide.</description><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Where I actually use this</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/where-i-actually-use-this/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/where-i-actually-use-this/</guid><description>The two-question check works on any decision that matters. Here&apos;s where I push it hardest, and where I wrote down what AI got wrong as well as right.</description><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Which AI picks the World Cup winner? I asked five</title><link>https://dixon.ai/posts/which-ai-picks-the-world-cup-winner/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dixon.ai/posts/which-ai-picks-the-world-cup-winner/</guid><description>Which AI predicts the World Cup winner? I asked five assistants on the same day: four said France, one said Spain, and none of them hedged.</description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>