AI Tests · Test
How often is ChatGPT wrong? 20 tests in 2026, one clear pattern
This site is the AI Reliability Tracker: we check six AI apps’ answers every month.
Run 2 · 11 Oct 2026 · free plans
30 tries eachChatGPT came fifth of six, ahead of only Grok
My tracker asked the free ChatGPT app a Highway Code question about footwear, built around a ban that doesn’t exist. Its whole answer was “97”.
Rule 97 is real. It asks that your shoes don’t stop you working the pedals. The ban isn’t, and ChatGPT took the question’s word for it three times out of three, two characters at a time.
Often enough to check, and not at random. The mistakes keep turning up in the same few places, like potholes on a road you drive every day. Once you know where they are, you can steer round them.
How often is ChatGPT wrong? What it got wrong in 2026
The free app first. Run 2 of my tracker went out on Sunday 11 October 2026: ten everyday questions, three tries each, every answer marked against the official source.
Bank holidays in 2027, Saturn’s moons, whether your own e-scooter can go on the pavement and towing speed limits all held. Free Grok got the same ten questions, and how that went is its own story.
Then OpenAI’s models, on a different test with different questions. Edition 2 of my Truth Index put 100 questions to 12 models on 2 November 2026, one try each, through the API (the route developers use) with no web search.
GPT-6.1 Sol got a Trust Score of 97 out of 100 (likely range 94 to 100), the top score of the twelve.
The Bluff Filter
Enter your email to get the Bluff Filter, a free check for any AI chat.
A two-minute read. Leave whenever you like.
The three places it goes wrong
Put the 30 app answers and Sol’s 100 side by side and, apart from one try that gave Shakespeare a birthday nobody wrote down, I count three kinds of mistake.
A wrong idea built into the question. Ask which rule bans something and it finds you a rule, as the footwear question showed.
A sum the calendar changes. A night shift across the October clock change went wrong three times out of three. Every answer named the clock change and did the sum both ways, then put the wrong total first, like a pupil who gets it right in the margin and copies the other line into the box. The clocks post has the full sum.
A fee that has just gone up. The old figure was right once, which is why it still sounds right. Sol’s three mistakes were all fees that went up in 2026.
| The fee | GPT-6.1 Sol said | The 2026 fee |
|---|---|---|
| NHS dental check-up, England | £27.40 | £27.90 (Apr) |
| Divorce, England and Wales | £612 | £628 (Jul) |
| Probate, estate over £5,000 | £300 | £526 (Jul) |
For two of the three it named GOV.UK as its source. On the dental charge it even said it couldn’t check whether the price had changed, and sent me to the NHS page. It had, by 50p. Its probate fee was right until July.
An earlier tally from mid-2026, about 20 documented cases (17 structured tests plus failures I logged in real use), found the same split, with fixed facts holding and live numbers made up.
It was the shop that never got round to changing its price stickers.
The three checks I run
I haven’t stopped using ChatGPT. Ask it the bank-holiday kind of question and it’s quick and mostly right.
Summary
The short version
What worked: plain facts with an official page behind them, from bank holidays to towing speed limits.
What didn’t: a ban that doesn’t exist, a night shift across the clock change, and fees that had just gone up.
Bottom line: ChatGPT is wrong in a predictable pattern, so you know which answers to check. I’ll change my mind the day it asks whether a ban exists before finding you a rule.
Common questions
- Can ChatGPT be wrong?
- Yes, and mostly in the same few places. Its wrong answers sound just as sure as its right ones.
- Does ChatGPT tell the truth?
- It doesn't lie, because it has no doubt to hide. It writes what a likely answer looks like, and an old fee still looks likely.
Confidently Wrong, every fortnight.
Which AI told the truth this month, with the receipts, plus an AI story worth retelling in between.
A two-minute read. Leave whenever you like.